Drivers for ps3 eye camera4/16/2024 ![]() ![]() On the very left side (red dot) the FOV is 56 and on the very right side (blue dot) the FOV is 75. The field of view (FOV) depends on which zoom level the lens barrel is rotated at. ![]() Only the FOV setting seems to be certain: Does this change with the new open-source driver and the MJPEG option? Perhaps the neuralnet or Aruco runs better with lower resolution and higher FPS settings. ![]() So in the past seems to be the most recommended option for the point tracker. However, they are mostly about the point tracker. Most comments I found seem to use for resolution 640x480 and for FPS 60 or 75. This Wiki page explicitly mentions not to use 320x240 or for the point tracker. It also sounds like MJPEG is generally a good thing and should be enabled. Are these recommended settings? According to the PS3 Eye Wikipedia article 187 FPS is the maximum. I didn't remove the IR filter, but instead used a visible light filter only(just cut up a floppy and attached it infront of the lense) and it works just fine.It would be very useful to add recommended settings to the end of the PS3 Eye camera driver wiki article for the point tracker, neuralnet tracker and the Aruco tracker.Ĭurrently at the end of that page is a screenshot which shows 320x240 200Hz being selected and MJPEG unchecked. If you have one try it, but if you have to buy it. Sony PS3 Eye IR-filter removal 1/2 + Sony PS3 Eye IR-filter removal 2/2 It seems to be hard removing the IR filter, see these (two) video's: I also tried the PS3 eye (with the IR filter in it) and it didn't track my IR lights. There are newer drivers around, the dev added a full SDK and a whole lot of other bits and pieces(directshow) that could aid implementation. It also only works with 640x480 at 30 or 60 fps. It would be very useful to add recommended settings to the end of the PS3 Eye camera driver wiki article for the point tracker, neuralnet tracker and the Aruco tracker. The problem is that it only works with one old driver, which is reported as a trojan. So whats the problem? Does freetrack HAVE to track in monochromatic? Does it work normally? I'm thinking about buying a PS3 eye for my PS3 AND for freetrack! I do think it could use more support as it seems a good solution with it's high FPS and high res capture. If the Freetrack Programmers together with the driver guy can manage it to send in Black-White, im sure this cam can be the new best cam for Freetrack available!Ĭan Free-Track optimized for this great camera?Īpparently not. Now the driver manufacturer (alex popovich) has made a PS3 Eye SDK public for better integration by other software, would be good for free-track i think! Is color (but hopefully can be changed). These items are dispatched from and sold by different sellers. Extremely sensitive to IR when IR-Filter removed. uxcell 10pcs 5mm 940nm Infrared Emitter Diode DC 1.35V LED IR Emitter Light Emitting Diodes Clear Blue Round Head TSAL6200 for Arduino. Cable connected (no bluetooth lag!) with USB2 It has another advantages over the Wii-Mote: This thing makes usually in 320x240 128FPS, with new drivers even 150FPS are possible. Now i found out that there is a device called PS3 Eye for the Playstation. ![]() However it is Bluetooth connected and having always a slight delay (unlike the hatd Track-IR). I think we all agree that the smoothest and quickest reaction combo for Free-Track is the currently Wii-Remote with its 100FPS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |